WebLaw School Case Brief; Michigan v. Summers - 452 U.S. 692, 101 S. Ct. 2587 (1981) Rule: A warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted. WebHUDSON V. MICHIGAN 2 Case Brief: Hudson v. Michigan Facts Booker T. Hudson was prosecuted and subsequently convicted of the possession of drugs and firearm …
hudson v. michigan Casebriefs
WebHUDSON V. MICHIGAN. 11I. BACKGROUND ON KNOCK-AND-ANNOUNCE AND EXCLUSIONARY RULES. The majority opinion, written by Justice Scalia, 17 . began with a brief discussion of the history of the knock-and-announce rule. The Court pointed out that the "common-law principle that law enforcement officers must announce their presence … Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require suppression of the evidence obtained in the ensuing search. diamond segmented cut-off discs for masonry
Hudson v. Michigan - Case Summary and Case Brief
WebPetitioner Keith J. Hudson, a prisoner in a Louisiana state prison, filed a lawsuit in federal district court under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 against defendants Jack McMillian, Marvin … Web11 jan. 2006 · The Fourth Amendment requires the police to knock and announce their presence before executing a search warrant, except in exigent circumstances. The police … WebThe trial court granted Hudson’s motion to suppress the evidence, but the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed. Hudson was convicted of drug possession. He appealed, again raising the exclusionary rule argument. … diamond select batman 89 statue