Hirani v kassam
WebGordon Sentiba & OTHRS V IGG CACA NO. 14/2007 6. Hirani V Kassam [1952] EACA 133 7. Morris Ogwal & OTHRS V AG HCMA No.456/07 8. Geoffrey Gateete & Anor. V William Kyobe SCCA No.7/2005 9. Meera Investments Ltd V … Web10 citing the case of Hirani v. Kassam 1952 E.A at 131 where the Court of Appeal held that; “A consent judgment cannot be varied or discharged unless obtained by fraud, collusion, …
Hirani v kassam
Did you know?
WebOn this basis, he argues Harriman waived any objections he might have had (Sambrano v. City of San Diego, supra, 94 Cal.App.4th at p. 236), and so the trial court was required to … in Hirani v Kassam [1952] EA 131, in which it approved and adopted the following passage from Seton on Judgments and Orders, 7th Ed., Vol. 1 p. 124: Prima facie, any order made in the presence and with consent of counsel is binding on all parties to the proceedings or action, and cannot be varied or
WebSee Bell V lever Bros Ltd (1952) AC 161. In the circumstances and bearing in mind the case of Hirani V Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131 AND Brooke bond and Liebig (T) Ltd v Mallya (1975) EA 266, such consent judgment would be set aside as between both the respondents. But then, that would not solve the appellant’s grievance as he was not a … WebIt can only be set aside for a reason which would enable the Court to set aside or rescind an agreement — see the celebrated case of Hirani v Kassam (1952) 19 ACA 131, In that …
WebThe law governing review and setting aside consent judgments was well articulated in the case of Ken Group of Companies Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank & 2 Others, H.C.M.A 116 of 2012 (Commercial Court) by Hon. Justice Madrama citing the case of Hirani v. Kassam 1952 E.A at 131 where the Court of Appeal held that; WebIt was set out by Windham J, as he then was, and approved by the Court of Appeal for East Africa, in Hirani v Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131, at 134, as follows: “The mode of paying …
http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/113949/
http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/21775/ long stay pet friendly hotels near meWebThat decision merely followed Hirani v Kassam [1952] 19 EACA 131. The affidavits in this case, ordered by the previous court, illustrate the futility of attempting to arbitrate at this stage between the rival claims. The parties are therefore left to their well-known remedies, and the appeal must fail. hope therapy center lake charlesWebFeb 25, 2024 · Hirani v Hirani [1982] EWCA Civ 1 (05 May 1982) MR. JUSTICE FRENCH. MR. JOHN FOX (instructed by Messrs Jack Bernstein & Co., solicitors, London) … long stay portugal from canadaWebThat decision merely followedHirani v Kassam[1952] 19 EACA 131. The affidavits in this case, ordered by the previous court, illustrate thefutility of attempting to arbitrate at this stage between the rival claims. The parties are therefore left to their well-known remedies, and the appealmust fail. long stay parking newcastle stationhttp://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/7824/ long stay parking stansted airporthttp://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/8181/ hope therapeutic servicesWebOct 15, 2015 · It was held in Hirani V Kassam (1952) 19 EACA 131 that:- ... The plaint in HCCS 015/2013 Brian Asiimwe V Margret Tumwine Tumushabe, however shows that the plaintiff’s (respondent in this case) claim against the defendant (1 st applicant in this case) was for, among other things, an order for the revocation/cancellation of a grant of letters ... long stay places near me